In its March 2017 decision in Czyzewski v. Jevic Holding Corp., the Supreme Court of the United States (the "Supreme Court") held that case-ending structured dismissals which circumvent the absolute priority rule and do not have a significant Bankruptcy Code related justification are impermissible. Because creditors' committees rely heavily on structured dismissals and related gifting provisions to obtain a recovery for holders of general unsecured claims ("GUCs") where a recovery would not otherwise be possible, practitioners and commentators have expressed concern over the long term implications of the Jevic decision.
Click here to view the full articleRelevant Insights
-
PROFESSIONALS | Lawyers
Access the profiles of the more than 350 Lowenstein Sandler lawyers who provide critical legal counsel to clients in virtually every sector of the global economy...
-
NEWS & INSIGHTS | Firm News
Discover the latest updates and developments about Lowenstein Sandler...
-
NEWS & INSIGHTS | Publications
Access our insightful thought leadership, including articles, client alerts, and blog posts...